Best Client Communication Tools for Agencies (2026)
We compared 10 leading client communication solutions to help you find the perfect platform for your agency. Compare client messaging, video updates, shared inboxes, ticket management, and portal access.
Overview
Client communication tools centralize how agencies interact with clients—email, chat, video, and messaging. They reduce scattered conversations, speed responses, and create a professional experience. Key capabilities include client messaging, video updates (e.g., Loom), shared inboxes, ticket management, and client portal access.
You can choose dedicated tools (Loom for video, Front for email) or all-in-one platforms (AgencyPro) that integrate communication with client portal and projects. Match the tool to how your clients prefer to communicate and whether you need support-style ticketing or simpler project-based messaging.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Key Feature | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1AgencyPro Best Overall | Small to mid-size agencies | $99/month | Client portal with messaging | 4.5/5 |
2Loom | Video updates and async communication | $12.50/user/month | Quick video messaging | 4.7/5 |
3Slack Connect | Real-time client channels | $7.25/user/month | Shared channels with clients | 4.6/5 |
4Front | Shared inbox for client email | $19/user/month | Unified inbox | 4.5/5 |
5Intercom | Live chat and support | $39/month | Conversational support | 4.5/5 |
6HubSpot | Agencies using CRM | Free | CRM with email and chat | 4.6/5 |
7Zendesk | Help desk and ticketing | $19/agent/month | Ticket management | 4.4/5 |
8Help Scout | Email-based support | $20/user/month | Shared mailboxes | 4.6/5 |
9Drift | Conversational marketing | $2,500/month | AI-powered chat | 4.4/5 |
10Crisp | Affordable live chat | Free | Unified inbox and chat | 4.5/5 |
Feature Comparison
| Tool | Client Messaging | Video Updates | Shared Inboxes | Ticket Management | Client Portal Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgencyPro | |||||
| Loom | |||||
| Slack Connect | |||||
| Front | |||||
| Intercom | |||||
| HubSpot | Via CRM | ||||
| Zendesk | Help center | ||||
| Help Scout | Docs | ||||
| Drift | |||||
| Crisp |
Detailed Reviews
AgencyPro
Small to mid-size agencies seeking integrated client communication
AgencyPro builds client communication into its client portal. Clients log in to view projects, access files, and message the team. All context—project status, deliverables, invoices—lives in one place. No separate chat tool or scattered email threads. Messaging is threaded per project, keeping conversations organized.
The portal is white-label: clients see your brand. Communication integrates with time tracking, invoicing, and project management. Clients get a professional, dedicated space; agencies get centralized history and no lost context. AgencyPro doesn't include video messaging (use Loom alongside) or advanced ticket/help-desk features. For agencies that want communication tied to projects and clients, it's a strong fit.
Pricing starts at $99/month with unlimited users. The value is in integration—one platform for projects, clients, and communication. Best for agencies that prefer fewer tools and a cohesive client experience.
Pros
- • Client portal with messaging
- • Projects and communication combined
- • White-label
- • Unlimited users
- • No tool sprawl
- • Centralized client context
Cons
- • No built-in video
- • No advanced ticketing
- • Fewer integrations than dedicated tools
Loom
Agencies wanting async video updates for clients
Loom lets you record quick video messages—screen share, face-to-camera, or both—and share via link. Clients watch async. Agencies use it for project updates, walkthroughs, feedback on designs, and onboarding. It reduces meeting burden and adds a personal touch that email can't match.
Recording is simple: click, record, share. Viewers can react with emojis and leave timestamped comments. Loom integrates with Slack, email, and project tools. It complements—not replaces—other communication. Many agencies use Loom + AgencyPro or Loom + Slack: Loom for video, the other for projects and day-to-day messaging.
Pricing starts at $12.50/user/month. Free tier has limits. Loom is best-in-class for async video. For full client communication (messaging, portal, projects), pair with a client-focused platform.
Pros
- • Async video messaging
- • Screen share and face cam
- • Timestamp comments
- • Integrations
- • Reduces meetings
- • Personal touch
Cons
- • Video only
- • No project or portal context
- • Requires separate tool for chat
Slack Connect
Agencies whose clients already use Slack
Slack Connect creates shared channels between your Slack and a client's. Both teams collaborate in real time without leaving Slack. Useful when clients prefer Slack and want fast, informal communication. You can share files, threads, and context in one channel.
Setup requires the client to have Slack. Channels can be single-channel (one shared channel) or multi-channel (deeper collaboration). The downside: no dedicated client space with projects, billing, or file organization. Conversations can blur internal/external. For agencies that want a clean client portal with projects, Slack Connect may feel scattered.
Pricing is part of Slack (from $7.25/user/month). Slack Connect suits agencies with Slack-native clients. For broader client communication with project context, consider a client portal platform.
Pros
- • Real-time with clients
- • Clients stay in Slack
- • File sharing
- • Familiar interface
- • Channels per client
Cons
- • Clients need Slack
- • No project/portal context
- • Can blur internal/external
Front
Agencies managing high-volume client email
Front is a shared inbox for email. Team members see and respond to client emails from one place. Assignments, internal notes, and @mentions keep the team coordinated. No more "who replied to this?" or lost threads. Front also supports chat channels and integrates with many tools.
Agencies use Front when email is the primary client channel. The unified inbox reduces chaos. Templates and shortcuts speed responses. Front doesn't include a client portal or project management—it's communication-focused. Pair with a project tool or all-in-one platform for full coverage.
Pricing starts at $19/user/month. Front excels at email. For agencies that need email plus projects and client portal, all-in-one platforms may consolidate better.
Pros
- • Unified inbox
- • Assignments and notes
- • Templates
- • Integrations
- • Team coordination
- • Email focus
Cons
- • No client portal
- • No project context
- • Per-user pricing
Intercom
Agencies needing live chat and conversational support
Intercom provides live chat, messaging, chatbots, and help center. It's designed for customer communication at scale. Agencies use it for client-facing chat on websites, in-app messaging, and support workflows. The platform is powerful but can feel enterprise-heavy for smaller agencies.
Intercom excels at conversational experiences—messaging, automation, and AI. Pricing scales with usage. It doesn't include project management or client portals. For agencies that need chat on a client portal or within projects, Intercom would need to be embedded and integrated. Best for agencies with website chat and support-style client communication.
Pricing starts at $39/month and scales. Intercom is feature-rich. For simpler needs, Crisp or built-in portal messaging may suffice. For complex support workflows, Intercom is a leader.
Pros
- • Live chat
- • Messaging
- • Chatbots
- • Help center
- • Automation
- • Scalable
Cons
- • Can be expensive
- • No project/portal
- • Enterprise focus
HubSpot
Agencies using HubSpot for CRM and marketing
HubSpot combines CRM, email, chat, and (on higher plans) ticketing. Free tier includes basic chat and email tracking. Agencies already in HubSpot get client communication without adding another tool. Contacts, deals, and communication stay in one system.
Chat can be embedded on websites. Email is tracked and logged to contacts. The CRM context helps—you see full client history when communicating. HubSpot doesn't include project management or client portals. For sales and marketing-focused agencies, it's a natural fit. For project delivery and client work, supplement with a project/portal tool.
Pricing: Free tier available; paid plans add features. HubSpot suits agencies that live in CRM. For project-centric communication, AgencyPro or similar may align better.
Pros
- • CRM integration
- • Free tier
- • Chat and email
- • Contact history
- • All-in-one CRM
- • Wide adoption
Cons
- • No project management
- • No client portal
- • Paid features add up
Zendesk
Agencies with help-desk-style client support
Zendesk is a help desk and ticket management platform. Client requests become tickets with status, assignment, and SLAs. Agents respond from a unified workspace. Knowledge base and macros streamline support. Agencies with support-like workflows (e.g., ongoing retainer support, troubleshooting) benefit.
Zendesk is built for support teams. It's robust but can feel heavy for simple client communication. It doesn't include project management or client portals. For agencies that need ticketing plus projects, consider an all-in-one or integration between Zendesk and a project tool.
Pricing starts at $19/agent/month. Zendesk suits agencies with formal support workflows. For project-based client communication, lighter tools or all-in-one platforms may fit better.
Pros
- • Ticket management
- • Knowledge base
- • SLAs
- • Unified workspace
- • Integrations
- • Enterprise-ready
Cons
- • Support-focused
- • No project/portal
- • Can be complex
Help Scout
Agencies preferring email-based support
Help Scout provides shared mailboxes, live chat, and knowledge base. It's designed for teams that treat support as email-first. Collision detection, assignments, and workflows keep the team coordinated. The interface is clean and user-friendly.
Help Scout suits agencies that want a humane support experience—no ticket numbers shoved in clients' faces unless needed. Docs site for self-service. It doesn't include project management or client portals. For project-centric agencies, pair with a project tool or use an all-in-one.
Pricing starts at $20/user/month. Help Scout is a solid middle ground between lightweight inbox and enterprise Zendesk. Good for agencies that value email and subtle support workflows.
Pros
- • Shared mailboxes
- • Clean interface
- • Live chat
- • Docs
- • Collision detection
- • Workflows
Cons
- • No project/portal
- • Email-focused
- • Per-user pricing
Drift
Conversational marketing and sales
Drift focuses on conversational marketing and sales—chatbots, AI, and intent-driven conversations. It's built for B2B companies generating and qualifying leads. Agencies use it when client acquisition and pipeline are the focus, not project delivery communication.
Drift is powerful but expensive. It's less suited for ongoing client communication during projects. For agency-client project work, Drift may be overkill. For agencies selling their own services and want sophisticated chat on their site, Drift is an option.
Pricing starts around $2,500/month. Drift suits large organizations and sales-led agencies. For most agencies managing client projects, more affordable and project-focused tools are a better fit.
Pros
- • AI chat
- • Conversational marketing
- • Intent detection
- • Sales focus
- • Sophisticated
Cons
- • Expensive
- • Sales-focused
- • Overkill for project communication
Crisp
Agencies wanting affordable live chat and shared inbox
Crisp offers live chat, shared inbox, and CRM in one. Free tier supports basic chat and one operator. Paid plans add team features, automation, and integrations. It's a cost-effective alternative to Intercom for smaller agencies.
Crisp provides chat widget, email, and CRM—all in one dashboard. It doesn't include project management or client portals. For agencies that need simple chat and inbox without the Intercom price tag, Crisp works well. For project-based client communication, pair with a portal or all-in-one platform.
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $25/month. Crisp suits budget-conscious agencies. For full client experience with projects, consider all-in-one platforms.
Pros
- • Free tier
- • Chat and inbox
- • Affordable
- • CRM included
- • Integrations
- • Simple
Cons
- • No project/portal
- • Fewer features than Intercom
- • Less enterprise focus
How to Choose Client Communication Tools
Consider these selection criteria:
- Client messaging: Do you need live chat, in-portal messaging, or email? Match the channel to how clients prefer to communicate.
- Video updates: Will async video (Loom) reduce meetings and add clarity? Pair with your primary communication tool.
- Shared inboxes: If email is primary, do you need a unified inbox? Front and Help Scout excel here.
- Ticket management: Do you have support-style workflows? Zendesk and Help Scout add structure. For project-based communication, may not be needed.
- Client portal access: Do clients need a dedicated login with projects, files, and messages? Portals reduce scatter and improve experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are client communication tools and why do agencies need them?
Client communication tools help agencies manage interactions with clients—email, chat, video, and messaging—in one place. They reduce scattered conversations across email, Slack, and ad-hoc calls. Agencies need them to respond faster, maintain context, and provide a professional experience. The right tools prevent missed messages, centralize client history, and support async communication (especially for distributed teams and clients in different time zones).
What is the difference between client messaging and shared inboxes?
Client messaging typically refers to chat-style communication (live chat, Slack Connect, in-portal messaging). Shared inboxes consolidate email—multiple team members see and respond to client emails from one mailbox. Tools like Front and Help Scout are shared inbox focused; Intercom and Crisp are chat-focused; some offer both. Choose based on how your clients prefer to communicate: if they mostly email, shared inbox. If they prefer quick chat or in-app messages, messaging-focused tools.
Why are video updates useful for client communication?
Video updates (e.g., Loom) let you send personalized, async video messages to clients. Instead of long emails or scheduling calls, you record a quick screen share or face-to-camera update. Clients watch on their schedule. Video builds trust, reduces miscommunication, and feels more personal than text. Agencies use Loom for project updates, walkthroughs, feedback on deliverables, and onboarding. It complements—not replaces—other communication channels.
What is ticket management and do agencies need it?
Ticket management (Zendesk, Help Scout) turns client requests into tracked tickets. Each request gets a unique ID, status, assignment, and history. Tickets ensure nothing falls through the cracks and provide metrics (response time, resolution time). Agencies with high request volume or support-like workflows benefit. For simpler client relationships, a shared inbox or portal messaging may suffice. Ticket systems add structure but also overhead—match the tool to your volume and complexity.
How does client portal access improve communication?
Client portals provide a dedicated space where clients log in to view projects, access files, send messages, and see status updates. All communication and context live in one place—no hunting through email. Portals reduce "where did we leave off?" and make it easy for clients to self-serve (e.g., check project status). AgencyPro and similar platforms build messaging into the portal. Clients get a professional, branded experience; agencies get centralized communication.
Should agencies use Slack Connect for client communication?
Slack Connect creates shared channels between your Slack workspace and a client's. Real-time collaboration happens in Slack—both sides stay in their own workspace. It works well when clients already use Slack and prefer that interface. Downsides: clients need Slack, conversations can blend internal/external, and there's no built-in project or file context. For agencies wanting a dedicated client space with projects and billing, a client portal may be cleaner.
How much do client communication tools cost?
Pricing varies: free tiers exist (HubSpot, Crisp) with limits. Per-user tools run $7-20/user/month. Shared inbox and help desk tools often charge per agent or seat. Enterprise solutions (Intercom, Drift) can reach $2,500+/month. All-in-one platforms like AgencyPro include client communication as part of the suite ($99/month). Consider total cost across tools—if you add chat, shared inbox, and video separately, an integrated platform may be more economical.
How do I choose between a dedicated communication tool and an all-in-one agency platform?
Dedicated tools (Intercom, Front, Loom) offer best-in-class features for their niche. All-in-one platforms (AgencyPro) integrate communication with projects, client portal, time tracking, and billing. Choose based on: Do you need deep help-desk features, AI chat, or advanced shared inbox? Dedicated may win. Do you want fewer tools and communication tied to projects and clients? All-in-one is compelling. Many agencies use Loom + AgencyPro (video + portal) or Front + project tool (email + PM).
Client Communication in Your Portal
AgencyPro puts client messaging inside your branded portal. Clients see projects, files, and messages in one place. No scattered email or separate chat tools.
14-day free trial • No credit card required • Cancel anytime